Archive

Posts Tagged ‘fascism’

9/11: CFL Fumbles, Dems Run With It

October 31, 2010 Leave a comment

Many 'Truthers' in CFL ranks

Ron Paul and his Campaign for Liberty (CFL) have worked tirelessly for freedom and for the restoration of the Constitution.  A progenitor of the Tea Party movement, its message of anti-statism and personal liberty has come to undeniably influence a major rebellion against Big Govt.  A populist denunciation of corporatist fascism is apparent in the 2010 midterm elections.

Born amid neoconservative betrayal of GOP principles, the CFL is the real hope and change to stop endless wars of aggression and occupation.  It has been singularly outspoken and defiant against the spurious “War on Terror” inspired police state. 

However, as in every classic epic, the hero has a fatal flaw that will prove to be his undoing later in the story.  For Ron Paul and the CFL leadership, the obvious Achilles heel is their silence on the truth of 9/11.  Dodging this issue in the obsession to win elections will prove to be a costly tactical error.  The evidence of 9/11 being an inside job abounds.  Further, to even the casual student of history, it is a blatant repeat of a “burning of the Reichstag” to terrorize the population into submission to tyranny and illegal wars of conquest.  It is the 800 pound gorilla in the living room we pretend is not there.  No, actually, it’s the halfwit cousin that always ruins the family reunion, but we keep inviting him because we think it’s the right thing to do.

Thanks to the present Faux News induced conservative mindset, the right thing to do for Republican Party candidates is to talk tough on terrorism.  If they don’t.., well, the fear of losing their power base eclipses any sincere motive to stand by a commitment to freedom.  In large part, the 2010 elections will be defined as a substantial boost for neocons repackaged as Tea Party patriots and as a disappointment for those hoping to stop the New World Order. 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 29, 2010                    
Colorado Democratic Party Calls for Grand Jury Investigation of 9/11

No surprise here.  Backed into a corner, career Democrat politicians, facing the prospect of pink slips, will be looking closer at 9/11.  A false flag event occurring under a Republican administration, it is ripe, and waiting, to be exploited by desperate progressives witnessing their demise.  Rest assured, though, any new investigation instigated by the left-wing of “The Powers That Be” will be a whitewash as much as the original 9/11 Commission Report .  Truthers need not get excited.

The real tragedy lies in the fact that Dr. Paul and the hierarchy of the CFL have dropped the ball.  Democrats will use 9/11 to demonize all Republicans; neocon, Tea Partier, and Paulista, alike.  Ironically, the activists,  to whom it was incumbent upon to expose and destroy the New World Order, have handed 9/11 to those that are imposing a controlled and regulated society.  9/11 will be a tool for merely bashing Bush, the Republican, and not a rightful rallying point to expose and defeat the financial power elite.  Hopefully, this recent announcement by Colorado Democrats will spur freedom lovers to do the real right thing.

Notes:

[1] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 29, 2010                                                      
Colorado Democratic Party Calls for Grand Jury Investigation of 9/11
 The 2010 Colorado Democratic Party platform, approved by the 146 member platform committee states:  “The Colorado Democratic Party calls for the establishment of a truly independent Grand Jury and public investigation in order to find the truth of the September 11, 2001 attacks.”  This controversial plank was added to the State Democratic Party Platform after evidence supporting the critical need for a new investigation was presented at several caucuses in 2004, 2008, and 2010.  The citizens who presented arguments for a new investigation at their precinct caucuses are signatories to the Architect and Engineers for 9/11 Truth organization (ae911Truth.org) which calls for a new investigation into the events of September 11, 2001. The quality of evidence contradicting the official 9/11 story is substantiated in part by the 2010 Platform Committee Chairman Hal Bidlack’s statement: “ ….this platform represents the consensus of the 2010 Platform Committee, guided by the results of county assemblies across our state.  

The folks who worked tirelessly on the Committee can rightly be proud of their efforts, and deserve our special thanks.” (Bidlack’s statement can be found on page one of the 2010 platform)  In the upcoming Colorado election, Green Party U.S. Senatorial candidate Bob Kinsey and District One U.S. Representative candidate Gary Swing have publicly stated they would support a new investigation into the events of September 11, 2001.  Clarifying information can be found at: www.ae911Truth.orgwww.911PressForTruth.comwww.911Truth.orgwww.911Research.wtc7.net,www.stj911.orgwww.911Review.com, and www.BuildingWhat.org.
Contact information:
www.Colorado911Visibility.org

[2] The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie: http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050523112738404

Advertisements

The Tea Party in a Time of War

September 3, 2010 Leave a comment

A real threat to the Anglo-American banking empire, the Tea Party’s tax revolt message could destabilize the financial engine that empowers the imperialist war machine and the socioeconomic totalitarianism that accompanies it.

Unfortunately, while Neocons are moving to co-opt and sabotage the Tea Party from within, the establishment statist Left are engaging in a frontal assault.  Both of these lackeys of the elite are desperate to defuse the populist challenge to the present paradigm.  Virtually working in a coordinated effort, Neocons are injecting militarist jingoism into this movement, comprised of fed up and frustrated everyday Americans happily unschooled in political correctness, giving the disingenuous Left fertile ground to attack the Tea Party as racist and fascist.[1]

If your only source of information is mainstream corporate news, the ideological roots of the Tea Party are completely obscured.  We passively watch TV and infer throngs of conservative white folks primarily complaining about “that Black guy in the White house”.  Started during the Bush years by Ron Paul pro-Constitution activists the original attempt to recapture the ideals of the founders of our republic is long lost from the picture.[2]

Helping to perpetuate the charade professional Republicrat henchmen, serving the banker-military complex, will do their best to cloak this timely populism and ideological mass appeal.  They will continue to depend on their respective Democrat and Republican congregations to swallow the lie that there is a substantial difference between each party.  Faithfully, they will plant campaign yard signs for Henchman A or Henchman B on their front lawns.  Tea Partiers, themselves, will allow neocon and status quo media celebrities, such as Palin and Beck, to speak for them.[3] 

Author, David Icke, succinctly warns, “anyone who seeks to prevent the free expression of thought by anyone else is an agent of control and they should know that before their self-delusion leads to the very fascist Orwellian state they claim to oppose.”[4]  Pseudo revolutionaries, on the left, will continue to harangue “tea baggers” in condescending and meaningless tirades.  Robot radicals will be willing stooges in parroting misrepresented views of any alternative outside of the corporatist mandated Left/Right paradigm. They will enthusiastically work for their own eventual destruction. 

Leftwing Racism

African-American Tea Partiers will continue to befuddle leftist ideologues. Anomalous to the standard Left/Right paradigm are Black conservatives.  The Leninist concept of Black Nationalism, as a tool to topple the white racist ruling class, is blunted upon the rock of individualism.   Freedom and the spirit of enterprise are attractions that cut across racial lines.

Nevertheless, Marxists will exhort the oppressed Blacks.  A current socialist propagandist writes, “.., the national liberation struggle of Black people in the U.S. must include the heightening of national consciousness, identity and self-respect. But these are not the same as nationalism, an ideology a world outlook, promoted by the bourgeoisie and petty bourgeoisie that advocates the primacy; exclusiveness and privilege of “their” nation.”.[5]

Prominent Tea Party figure, Rev. C.L. Bryant, a former president of NAACP’s Garland, Texas chapter, is one who doesn’t fall prey to the separatist hype.  He says the idea that the Tea Party is racist or is trying to instigate a racist climate is “simply a lie.” Bryant claims the NAACP wants to “create a climate where they can say that those on the right are in fact racist and those on the left are their saviors”…[6]

What is the Tea Party?

One activist writer accurately captures its populist nature and potential:  “Do any of us even know how to define a Liberal or a Conservative these days? After all, in 8 years of a “Conservative” president we saw preemptive interventionist wars and nation building on the backs of the taxpayer, runaway borrowing and spending, and massive growth in government.  Meanwhile, the “Liberal” savior Obama continues to expand the wars, torture captives without trials or evidence, and target all forms of free speech.  Where it matters most, both political parties cater to Wall Street over Main Street, while working to restrict our Constitutional rights.  Fierce populist revolutions have been fought over far less oppression than we see today (see 1776), and yet the generally angry public can’t seem to focus long enough to form a strong common consensus…  Indeed, the Ron Paul crowd and the Liberal crowd have much in common when it comes to very important issues such as Peace, Auditing the Fed, Individual Liberty, Economic Freedom and Justice, and the Human Rights defined in the U.S. Constitution.” .[7]

Pollster, Scott Rasmussen, describes the mindset:  “Americans don’t want to be governed from the left or the right,” Scott Rasmussen tells the American Legislative Exchange Council, a conference of 1,500 conservative and moderate legislators. “They want, like the Founding Fathers, to largely govern themselves with Washington in a supporting — but not dominant — role. The tea party movement is today’s updated expression of that sentiment… The major division in this country is no longer between parties but between political elites and the people,” Mr. Rasmussen says.”[8]

Rasmussen also observed that, although the GOP stands to benefit in the 2010 elections, 75 percent of Republicans believe that the party leadership is out of touch with them.

War, what is it good for?

Researcher-author, William Bramley conducted a seven year investigation into the causes of war.  He fully expected to find profit as the primary motivation, however, he concluded that war can also be used to encourage populations to think in ways they would not otherwise do, and to accept the formation of institutions they would normally reject.  The longer a nation involves itself in wars, he noted, the more entrenched those institutions and ways of thinking will become.[9]

The Tea Party, regardless of its current problems, conceptually embodies something new and revolutionary beyond entrenched ways of thinking.  It is anomalous to generations of accumulated unquestioning reverence for, and dependence on, an all powerful centralized federal government.  As its name implies, it hearkens back to an era and mental outlook unfettered by ‘endless war’, states of emergency, and presidential directives.

Riding the Tea Party wave and pandering to the rhetoric of “limited government”, the establishment GOP will, no doubt, recoup some electoral losses incurred in 2008.  No fundamental change will occur.  Only a people’s movement able to connect the dots between the financial elite’s wars of occupation abroad and the loss of freedom at home will be able to make revolutionary change.  

Only a people’s movement, ready to fully embrace the spirit of 1776, will be able to restore our republic.  A priority for peace and freedom advocates is to expose the false dichotomy offered by the Republicrat duopoly dictatorship and its singular agenda of serving the transnational financial elite.  Concurrently, the masses must be reminded of their inherent capacity for local self-reliance and self-determination.


[1] Protofascism Comes to America: The Rise of the Tea Party, By Ted Rall, July 22, 2010 “Information Clearing House”: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article25994.htm 
[2] Yahoo News Rewrites History of Tea Party: http://www.infowars.com/yahoo-news-rewrites-history-of-tea-party/  
[3] We Need a Revolution, Not a Movement: http://www.infowars.com/we-need-a-revolution-not-a-movement/
[4]  Tales from the Time Loop, David Icke, Page 448.
[5] Nationalism, Self-Determination and Socialist Revolution, By Amiri Baraka:     http://www.leftspot.com/blog/?q=node/343
[6] Uncommon Sense: America, Racism, & Hypocrisy: http://davegj13.wordpress.com/2010/07/13/america-racism-hypocrisy/
[7] Celente Says Populists Will Break the False Left-Right Political Paradigm: http://www.activistpost.com/2010/07/can-populists-break-false-left-right.html
[8] Rasmussen: Tea Party Sweeping US, Anger at GOP: http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/Scott-Rasmussen-pollster-wall-street-journal-john-fund/2010/08/22/id/368091
[9] Alien Agenda, Jim Marrs, p. 529.

In A Perfect World: ObamaCare

August 24, 2009 Leave a comment

In a supreme disconnect with reality the Left is pushing for a single payer health care program.  Needless to say, ‘single payer’ translates to ‘government run’.  It cannot effectively be otherwise.  An astouding desire for a political grouping that decries oppression and advocates choice.  How can this be?

progress obamaWe are undeniably within a transitional era marked by crony capitalism morphing into national socialism.  With the groundwork laid by the Neocons, the Obama administration will continue to build the total surveillance State.  This is not an option cooked up by radical social engineers.  It will be out of necessity.

Much of our industrial base has been moved overseas.  The once prospering and comfortable middle class is shrinking and in panic mode.  Mainstream prognosticators now acknowledge that massive civil unrest looms as the value of the dollar plunges and the central private banks continue their looting spree unabated and backed by a complicit federal government. 

The Marxist View

Our country’s founders knew well the painful tyranny of despotic monarchy.  In a unique and singular event in all of history they created a constitutional republic endeavoring to legally enshrine freedom for generations to come.   Rightfully so, it was a government structure that reflected free enterprise.  Classical capitalism depends on the free movement of labor and capital.  Each man and woman were free to choose their livelihood.  Marx described the government of a capitalist economy as,  “but a committee for managing the common affairs of the bourgeoisie as a whole.”  (Manifesto, Marx, 1848) 

Marx went on to say that capital inevitably concentrates.  Financial assets flow to even fewer bank accounts as more small businesses fail and corporations merge.  Correspondingly, the State, as an evolving structure dedicated to the current needs of the bourgeosie, must defend the gains made by its paymasters and initiate more police state measures to repress rebellion engendered by growing impoverishment and discontent.  Fascism, Marx said, is the inescapable (dialectical) outcome in the later stages of capitalism.  The Republic is falling.  The Empire is emerging. 

Dangerous Idealism 

Curiously oblivious to a pragmatic and materialist conception of capitalist class relations socialists, and leftists in general, now desire the federal government to dispense and/or supervise our nation’s health care.  In a brazen abandonment of their Marxist ideological roots, they expect the Feds to humanely care for our health.  Am I missing something here?!!  The last I knew, Marxists regard the government as merely the executor and protector of the exploitative capitalist ruling class.

October 1917 Revolution

October 1917 Revolution

So where did this idealism come from?  An astute Marxist-Leninist will admit the futility of this thinking and note that it is only a stratagem.  It is an ‘issue’ to promote in order to raise class consciousness.  In other words, as the people struggle for socialized medicine, or any other ‘human right’, such as free housing, guaranteed employment, etc., the masses will be educated as to the true nature of capitalism and, disgruntled, be easily led to overthrow the government.., and seize the means of production.  The ‘issue’ is solely a means to an end.  And, in theory, thenceforward a workers’ state would be established to eradicate all vestiges of capitalist behavior and thought; Totalitarianism.

Today’s ‘Liberals’ would abhor Soviet or Chicom forms of government.  However, in his controversial book, “Liberal Fascism”, Jonah Goldberg argues that modern Liberals are philosophically descended from 19th and 20th century Progressives.*  Then, as now, Progressives have in common an undying faith that only an all powerful government can cure society’s ills and right all wrongs.  All answers can be found within varying degrees of statism.  It is an idealist mindset.  At best, it is naivete often used by others with dark motives.  It is an invitation to totalitarianism and worse horrors.  Horrors produced when self-righteous elitism is unleashed.

For example, eugenics was popular among early Progressives.  It was of necessity a program that could only be carried out by government force.  The thought of relying on individual choice as a way to sterilize and abort humans with ‘inferior’ genes to create a racially pure utopia was anathema.., obviously.  Although it could be argued that Planned Parenthood, and similar progeny of the Eugenics movement, work quite well without government enforcement to trim the population, they fall short of Margaret Sanger’s** ideal, as well as the ideal of one of her avid supporters, Hitler. 

The Progressive movement is also marked by what I call, ‘good will imperialism’.  Jeffersonian “peace and commerce with all nations” and the acknowledgement of the right of national self-determination are replaced with aggression against other countries if they do not conform to our version of enlightenment and democracy.., the perfect cloak for wars of occupation and corporate pillage. 

Intrinsically philosophically idealist, Progressivism ideology stands in contrast to classical Marxist philosophical materialism that is normally associated with true left-wing politics.  Based on Marxist reasoning alone, progressive left thinking is closer to fascism than it is to democratic socialism.   

A Happy and Perfect World

A Happy and Perfect World

In an ideal and perfect world wise and compassionate rulers would lovingly administer health care to all according to the Progressive Left faithful.  This type of socialism promoted by the Progressive Left has less to do with a workers’ revolution than what it does with a Huxlian Brave New World mentality.  It is mindset ripe to be cultivated and managed by charismatic fascist leaders promising Change.   This is not conjecture.  It is well documented that social progressives supported Mussolini in his rise to power.  Mussolini, another socialist change politician, promised improved economic conditions and ‘holistic’ solutions, as well.

‘ObamaCare’, or any other stripe of a single payer health care system, would be a ready made launch platform for eugenics and even outright genocide.  Socialists, and the fashionably socialist, who pay intellectual homage to Marx, should reexamine their own fundamental ideologies.   As freedom lovers and patriots, we would do well to point out these inconsistencies to those Americans on the left interested in critical and independent thinking. 

 * “Liberal Fascism” by Jonah Goldberg: http://www.randomhouse.com/broadway/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=9780767917186

** Blackgenocide.org: http://blackgenocide.org/sanger.html

In future posts we will explore further the current false Left/Right dichotomy.  Presently, we are asked to choose between fascism or communism, i.e., Dictatorship A or Dictatorship B.

%d bloggers like this: